April 13, The play begins with all but one of the jurors certain of the defendant's guilt.
Stubbornness and Taking a Stand Prejudice vs. Sympathies Summary Analysis The Judge gives the jury instructions from offstage, setting the scene as the lights come up. He or she lays out the stakes: He informs the jurors that they must find the defendant not guilty if there is a reasonable doubt that he is guilty.
The vote must be unanimous. The Guard opens the window, surveys the room, and moves upstage to count the jurors as they enter.
However, the window, the water cooler, and the opportunity to play tic-tac-toe later distract the jurors. Active Themes As the jurors enter, some go to the water cooler, Juror Five lights a pipe, and Juror Seven opens the window a bit wider, while still others stand and lean on their chairs.
These mundane activities establish the jurors first and foremost as human beings, capable of flaws and prejudices.
Active Themes Juror Seven nervously offers gum to the men at the water cooler and makes idle chat. Juror Nine responds to Juror Seven with a polite no.
Juror Twelve complains about the heat in the room, saying that his taxes are so high they ought to cover air conditioning.
The Guard locks the door behind him as he leaves, with all the jurors settled in their seats. Twelve is self-focused and used to privilege. Seven is flighty, and only vaguely interested in the proceedings, which he hopes will end quickly.
Nine is aloof, but polite. The Guard reminds the jurors and the audience of the presence of a world and legal structure beyond the jury room. Juror Three bristles at the need for the door to be locked.
Active Themes Juror Four, acting as a peacemaker, asks everyone to openly admit that the heat in the room has them short-tempered. Juror Three, acting the contrarian, responds that he feels fine. The Foreman suggests in response that serving on a jury is their duty, while Juror Three jokes that Juror Four should give Juror Twelve a job, noting that Juror Four is probably rich because of his custom-tailored suit.
Throughout, Four is rational and levelheaded. On the subject of the overly hot room he urges mature behavior, while Three shows a childish inclination to disagree for the sake of disagreement. Ideas about income and the difficulties of living in poverty appear throughout the play, affecting the jury members views in general and of the case.
Active Themes The Foreman then comments that he had a friend who wanted to be on the jury instead of him. The Foreman continues that his friend served on a jury where they found the defendant not guilty, but later learned that he really did the murder.
Juror Four notes that the double jeopardy law would prevent that man from being retried for the same crime.
Seven and Three reveal their certainty about the case, and it does not appear that the evidence presented or the arguments made in court were well balanced between prosecution and defense. The switch knife, which the kid purchased and claimed to have lost, appears in the story as one of the most important pieces of evidence.
Yet Ten focuses not on this evidence, but on the character of impoverished people. Active Themes Juror Seven, meanwhile, expresses his impatience to get to a current Broadway show that night."Twelve Angry Men" quickly became a classic story for stage and screen and Rose's cast of characters some of the most memorable in modern history.
Yet, not one of the twelve jurors has a name, they are simply known by their juror numbers. Twelve Angry Men Debrief Questions 1.
What type of decision was the group instructed to reach (e.g. majority, consensus, authoritarian, etc.) * When the 12 person jury meets in the room to vote on a guilty or non-guilty verdict, the method used to vote was 1st based on a majority decision-making process where those would raise their hands for guilty and a non-guilty verdict.
Write my essay in time! Order papers from our professional team that offers paper writing on any type of topic.
Fast, cheap and unique! Angry Men Questions.
12 Angry Men Questions Shakily Mira April, 20th 1. Do you think that the jury in this movie came to the right decision? Free research essays on topics related to: black man, twelve angry men, fair trial, kill a mockingbird, atticus Research essay sample on Twelve Angry Men And To Kill A .
Overview. Twelve Angry Men is a story of twelve jurors who must each battle their own demons in the process of determining the fate of a young man on trial for murder.
As you cover this story in.